This is an interesting discussion on poor return to policyholder and the company in picture is "PXXXXXXXXX". I would say commission is needed for advisers as this their source of income. However, wouldn't it have been better if the cost is paid to an IFA who provides services in comparing the various products in the market and recommends the best ones? We should be gunning for service based and not product based.
http://tankinlian.blogspot.com/2007/11/poor-return-to-policyholder.html
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
I would like to apologize that sigining of my guestbook is not possible at the moment due to an unexpected bug. There is already 74 entries ...
-
*********** Try to sleep now, close your eyes Soon the birds would stop singing Twinkling stars, are shining bright They'll be watch...
-
Singapore's Land Transport Authority has just released an updated official MRT map including one additional station on the Downtown Line... -
Installed FortiClient recently but the challenge in disabling the application/service from running automatically on every start-up annoyed m...
-
People's Action Party MP, Mr Inderjit Singh, debated on the Population White Paper and put up his point across that he is against his ow...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Do provide your constructive comment. I appreciate that.